Insights/Decision science

Turning telemetry into a strategy your board can read

Priya RaghunathanPrincipal, Decision Science
March 18, 2026 · 12 min read
Copy linkXLinkedIn

On this page

The problem with undocumented callsWhat a decision record actually containsWhere AI genuinely helpsStarting this quarter

Want the decision-record template we use with clients?

Get the template →

A board does not want your telemetry. It wants to know which three numbers changed, why, and what you intend to do about it.

Description is not decision

Most analytics functions are excellent at description and poor at consequence. The dashboard shows churn ticking up; nothing in the artefact says what threshold triggers a response, or whose response it is.

The fix is unglamorous: attach an owner and a trigger to every metric you put in front of leadership. A number without a trigger is trivia.

A number without a trigger is trivia.

Three numbers, not thirty

We ask clients to nominate three metrics that would change the operating plan if they moved by more than a stated amount. Everything else moves to a second tier that nobody reviews live. The discipline is in what you exclude.

Write the narrative first

Draft the paragraph you would want to read six months from now, then build the measurement that would let you write it honestly. Teams that reverse the order end up instrumenting whatever was easiest to instrument.